vegetarians and omnivores, n=128, not significant. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21118604
-
-
-
Good find. Pretty short tho, only 5 d.
-
Our study with Lindy Rae benefited from double blind placebo+ washout control. Has replicated. Only vegans (zero creatine diet) benefit
-
Do you know of any other follow-ups or planned follow-ups? Seems like a fairly important result to make sure we get right.
-
Agree understanding if creatine buffering can increase energy for neuronal work important, but has been abandoned AFAIK.
-
John
@JProtzko, maybe a job for you? :) As long as you promise to not bury the results! - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Some creatine studies not published, lots of cherrypicked measures; definite publication bias in this area: https://www.gwern.net/Creatine
-
But yes, subgroup-specific effects do seem like the simplest explanation for the current pattern of results.
-
For the love of ..., please publish somewhere so people can find your stuff. Just put it on psyarxiv! Then it gets indexed.
-
Eh. It shows up in Google. And it's not a very useful result because so few studies wound up being usable at all; hard to interpret results.
-
I don't search google when I look for science. Neither does anyone else (you don't count).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
coincidently I'm watching your video with
@RealityCallsCo where she is citing creatine as a nootropic enhancer right now -
Not a coincidence. Did not know this study, hence why I'm looking into it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.