Looked at his books a few times, did not decide on which was most relevant & updated. Best choice? @bechhof @jasonacollins
Is there a statistically rigorous alternative introduction to this area? Important topic, but crappy stats in published literature!pic.twitter.com/OfdVwqYd4x
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sounds like small n studies. Book from 2000. I looked up the first example: recognition heuristic for cities.
@bechhof@jasonacollins -
4 study paper, published 2 years after the book (cited as submitted). n = 22, 21, 52 students, 16 Germans
@bechhof@jasonacollins
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well, replication crisis told me not to trust anything out of these fields. This review is by same authors, and mostly narrative. Bad signs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the priming stuff and the different typographies thing and what else? Thought it was only that.
-
You could do a book-wide replication index and find out! :) Easier version: just find the sample sizes of all the studies reported
@ArtirKel -
N<100s everywhere?
-
Besides the piece that you link too, has anyone written down a breakdown of the failures to replicate?
-
No, that sounds like JL work to me! :)
@ArtirKel -
It's actually a good post idea(!)
-
Write it for a paper, post on psyarxiv, so others will find it. Little extra work (have to use citations, not links).
@ArtirKel
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.