@KirkegaardEmil What is your opinion of this? True but misleading? @JayMan471 http://bio.research.ucsc.edu/~barrylab/classes/animal_behavior/GENETIC.HTM#anchor272602 …pic.twitter.com/dmkNxakztD
Claims large womb effects. Except that these are ~0. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194213/ … http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=5873 @SR71999 @JayMan471
-
-
I've seen Robert Sapolsky argue (albeit briefly) roughly same for twins and IQ. How can experts be so mistaken, one wonders.
-
To check for maternal effects: compare paternal vs. maternal half-sib, DZ vs. singleton sibs.
@SR71999@JayMan471 -
First for effect size of sequential womb sharing, second effect difference with same time vs. sequential.
@SR71999@JayMan471
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.