at or above the level of CA of self-identifying whites in this dataset
-
-
i.e., it's consistent with genes potentially explaining the entire gap, but obviously it's not super precise
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
and one could argue SES associated with ancestry explains it
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I project the black regression across the entire range here(you can compare to the fat blue dot for white means)pic.twitter.com/4yzIGQUWtP
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
Exercise not super interesting because of the low precision, but yeah, should maybe include such a plot.
@RCAFDM@pnin19571 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
Okay. I changed my mind. I worked out all the results based on this approach and it's a good idea. Will update paper.
@RCAFDM@pnin19572 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @RCAFDM
Good choice. I'd also convert g scores to IQ scale (100; 15) & multiply ancestry by 100 for better interpretability.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
in other samples because these are usually based on Whites only. Can't easily do that here due to restriction of range.
@pnin1957@RCAFDM1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
Euro-Afri genotypic gaps estimated to be: 1.20, 1.40 (AA sample), 1.30 (Hisp. sample). Euro-Amer gap .79.
@pnin1957@RCAFDM1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
Naive conversion to IQ thus: African genotypic IQ = 80. Amerindian genotypic IQ = 88. Lynn will not be surprised...
@pnin1957@RCAFDM0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.