suggest that maybe two-thirds of the gap genetic in the sample.
-
-
Replying to @pnin1957 @KirkegaardEmil
in both estimates if blacks had the same genetic fraction as their white identifying counterparts they'd be+
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
at or above the level of CA of self-identifying whites in this dataset
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
i.e., it's consistent with genes potentially explaining the entire gap, but obviously it's not super precise
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
and one could argue SES associated with ancestry explains it
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I project the black regression across the entire range here(you can compare to the fat blue dot for white means)pic.twitter.com/4yzIGQUWtP
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
Exercise not super interesting because of the low precision, but yeah, should maybe include such a plot.
@RCAFDM@pnin19571 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
Okay. I changed my mind. I worked out all the results based on this approach and it's a good idea. Will update paper.
@RCAFDM@pnin19572 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
One nice thing about the unstd. betas/predictions is that they are resistant to restriction of range which affects std.
@RCAFDM@pnin19571 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.