I don't see how this can be explained by assortative mating bias. What does the AE model proponent say? @JayMan471 @KirkegaardEmil
Swedish population-wide n=2100, adoption study for education & income. Looks like non-trivial C effects to me. https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/121/3/999/1917900/The-Origins-of-Intergenerational-Associations …pic.twitter.com/pkEm0L4nbB
-
-
-
.
@KirkegaardEmil Adoption in Sweden was non-random during that timehttps://twitter.com/JayMan471/status/580816958473388032 … -
Very small effect. Read the paper.
@JayMan471 -
That depends on what they looked at. I don't take C findings from that era in Sweden seriously for that reason.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Annoying is that they did not calculate total biological and total adoptive effect sizes. One cannot just sum betas!
@KirkegaardEmilThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do adoptive parents get a choice in selecting among the children who are put up for adoption? If yes, that could bias...
-
They tested that and found minor impact.
@LukasSchlogl -
Interesting, thanks. Could have checked that myself, I guess.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.