@KirkegaardEmil *Dr*!
-
Yes, but it's controversial and mostly published in non-mainstream journals. I will need more work b4 trying.
@cjprofman@ArtirKel
And most citations are self-citations because I work fast and publish in places most people don't read. With time this @cjprofman @ArtirKel
-
-
And this is any different from other academics :)
-
I'm a bit less optimistic regarding those scientific practices, and specially for your area.
-
I guess the most easily pushable thing is the S factor
-
S factor is not my idea. It's from Clark. What I did was systematize the study of it using factor analysis.
@ArtirKel@cjprofman -
Didn't say it was, but that is a contribution of you that is could be readily cited without fear of ostracism
-
It's also fairly boring and not worth a fancy title. :p Rather have title for my research into verboten territory!
@ArtirKel@cjprofman
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
pattern will change I think (hope). not bc I will publish elsewhere but bc scientific publication practice will change
@cjprofman@ArtirKelThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.