See http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00324.x/abstract …, but smallish n. Meta-analysis also find other-reported pers. to be more valid predictors. @_r_c_a @LarsPenke
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Both have own biases, can't say one generally more valid. Best to aggregate. Classic: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/per.2410080302/abstract …
-
Validities from meta-analysis. http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=6457
@LarsPenke@_r_c_apic.twitter.com/JU60Gyu570
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
WRT h², Bielefeld group (Angleitner, Riemann, Borkenau) did best work on pers rater, e.g. http://psych.colorado.edu/~carey/Courses/PSYC5112/Readings/psnBig5_Borkenau.pdf …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also very relevant for validity is this one by
@siminevazire: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/95/5/1202/ …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.