sorry if I bother, would be surprised if you didn't know, but you can maybe adjust for assortative mating given studies…
-
-
-
attempting to quantify its bias(in its section here, between .02 to .14, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jopy.12226/full … and http://go.nature.com/2iXJGkE
-
Nice review. Better to use the values .10 &.14 I think. Would like to see extended family study that can estimate more params
@SilverVVulpes -
yeah I'd also bet for high end. articles in issue not bad, another one on question washttps://twitter.com/SilverVVulpes/status/819827035598180352 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.