Thanks for the feedback on mindset paper @Twitter ! Not a bad turn around to revision-1 @socarxiv! 10-hours 
https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/tsdwy …
-
We tested 600+ children individually… No one predicts
#mindset is so trivial in its effects that it is invisible, do they?
Never underestimate the ability of people to come up with ad hoc hypotheses to save a particular claim! Sad! @timothycbates
-
-
what about a Chilean data set
@claro? Main problem with this studies too many crossectional. -
Their claims predict cross sectional effects too. It's like a modern version of self-esteem movement
@macordero@timothycbates@claro -
this big problem in all psychology... children have evocative effects and mindsets is one.. I Think so
-
The link do the large Chilean dataset here is dead. Can you help? http://www.pnas.org/content/113/31/8664.abstract …
@macordero@timothycbates@claro -
I have completed the form and the data available is not what you need. I'll try to help!
-
Thanks. Always looking for more data. If these large datasets pan out, going to be hard to argue null case.
@macordero@timothycbates@claro -
dataset is cross sectional and mindset are probably highly correlated with IQ ..so null case is open
-
Mindset correlated near zero with IQ in OKCupid dataset (cross-sectional).
@macordero@timothycbates@claro - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.