Interesting. There is lots of research into journals screwing up but not much into interventions to improve [1/2]
Sobering overview of problems with peer review. Peer review is not magic and the cost is very large. http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/21/peer-review-replication-and-publication-bias/ …
-
-
-
[2/2] quality assurance in publishing. Peer-review isn't "broken" just because it doesn't work all the time.
-
-
Blinding submissions seems a sensible policy, though we haven't implemented it (yet?) at ENVINT.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Sure, but I was talking about science, no crap humanities. In those, anything goes. @Melancholalia
@HobbesianM@RealPeerReview
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.