before or after we provide studies which disprove? Or is partial invalidation of data enough?
Growth mindset, presumably the next social psych hyped theory to fall. https://www.buzzfeed.com/tomchivers/what-is-your-mindset … Very suspicious results in published studies.
-
-
-
Results suspicious, implausibly large effect size, theory does not fit with other data, low prior to begin with.
@RebelAthletics@BuzzFeed -
so what's your personal opinion on the idea. Would you encourage your kids in one particular way over the other?
-
(adult) Intelligence is genetics and noise, but without hard work, you get nowhere. Achievement is what matters.
@RebelAthletics@BuzzFeed -
you do seem to be leaving out the "hard work" factor. It's not just noise if it's half the factor.
-
Odd comment. I'm all about hard work. But that is heritable too, I'm not under any illusions.
@RebelAthletics@BuzzFeed -
hard work is heritable? That could be as questionable as dweck's theories, couldn't it?
-
Everything is heritable. Only question is how much.
@RebelAthletics@BuzzFeed
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
caution is always wise, but at what point do we abandon an idea that seems to hold promise?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.