Perhaps @fsnole1 is famous enough that if he wrote a piece, they would accept it? :) @KirkegaardEmil
My proposal for term that should be better known: sociologist's fallacy aka. genetic mediation. https://www.edge.org/contributors/what-scientific-term-or%C2%A0concept-ought-to-be-more-widely-known …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or sometimes genetic confounding. The fallacy consists of assuming 'environmental' variables are not heritable too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A lot of the contributors are quite unknown to me, but of course they have tons of bigshots. Maybe give it a try?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Routinely ignored. :) Why else do we get studies like this? http://www.nature.com/neuro/journal/v18/n5/full/nn.3983.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No idea. But I guess there is a way to find out! :) editor@edge.org. I mean, you would be providing them with free content. ;)
-
I liked many of the terms mentioned. Unsure if my pick ('gloomy prospect')is too much for the poor laymen though :)
-
Regression towards the mean should have been good, but it was not. https://www.edge.org/response-detail/27013 …
@SilverVVulpes @fsnole1 - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Paper is quite causal in the wording and author denies genetic mediation. Also got a huge grant on the basis of this...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.