-
-
Replying to @JProtzko @LarsPenke
@KirkegaardEmil and multiple testing and demand effects I suppose?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rubenarslan @_r_c_a and
On the other hand: try psychedelics yourself and your prior about this effect will be very strong! :)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @_r_c_a and
On the third hand, who gives you ethical approval to give 200 people LSD? They probably want a pilot study.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
approving non-informative research even less ethical..
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rubenarslan @_r_c_a and
In their view, it could be dangerous, so approving large scale study would be dubious.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @_r_c_a and
Ofc, LSD isn't dangerous, but the people who sit on IRBs can't be expected to know that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
if you convince an IRB at all, might as well do it right
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rubenarslan @_r_c_a and
We brought it to ours as a possibility for a larger, pre-registered experiment. The University said no.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Just now, or before?
-
-
Maybe 5-6 months ago
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.