single self reported items have substantial measurement error.
-
-
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @JayMan471
huh. Like comparing yourself to your friends and thus adding bias? Other measures give smaller or bigger gaps?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes @JayMan471
This question makes little sense tome. Look into self vs. other ratings. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21038940
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's a no-brainer that single items are not so reliable, i.e. random measurement error. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spearman%E2%80%93Brown_prediction_formula …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @JayMan471
yes, I just meant as in, supposing a bigger sex dif than that and most people having mostly same-sex friendships…
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
maybe a very emotional male rates himself very high compared with his male friends, while having something...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
not unusual in females. that being said thanks for the answer and links.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SilverVVulpes @JayMan471
You are talking about the problem with these implicit comparison group, questions. I agree. Prefer ratio scale.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Not: how often do you cry (never, rarely, sometimes, often) Instead use: number of times cried last 1/2/3/4 weeks.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @JayMan471
oh, you are right that would reduce that kind of bias. thanks,will look for that kind of stuff in future studies
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Not often used AFAIK. But give me some money and I will do a study. :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.