They haven't released any measures of whether CFAR makes people more successful, compared to a control group.
-
-
AFAIK, poor evidence that debiasing works. http://www3.nd.edu/~ghaeffel/Lilienfeld2009%20Perspectives%20on%20Psychological%20Science.pdf …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I recently saw this http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11245-016-9388-x … , but haven't read it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
These rationality tests don't seem to correlate with much useful anyway. https://youtu.be/xmpFKxTLHCc?t=1779 …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @ArtirKel and
So maybe LW-style rationalism is just another psychology fad that doesn't work. Funny if true! :)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @ArtirKel and
On the counter-side: training does seem to help making better predictions á la GJP.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @ArtirKel and
The big question is: does improved GJP-predictive ability improve other areas of life?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Perhaps rationality is only useful to acquire information that is largely 'useless'.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Ironic if true, given the amount of dedication and rationalism required to work that out! :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.