They haven't released any measures of whether CFAR makes people more successful, compared to a control group.
AFAIK, poor evidence that debiasing works. http://www3.nd.edu/~ghaeffel/Lilienfeld2009%20Perspectives%20on%20Psychological%20Science.pdf …
-
-
I recently saw this http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11245-016-9388-x … , but haven't read it.
-
These rationality tests don't seem to correlate with much useful anyway. https://youtu.be/xmpFKxTLHCc?t=1779 …
-
So maybe LW-style rationalism is just another psychology fad that doesn't work. Funny if true! :)
-
On the counter-side: training does seem to help making better predictions á la GJP.
-
The big question is: does improved GJP-predictive ability improve other areas of life?
-
Perhaps rationality is only useful to acquire information that is largely 'useless'.
-
Ironic if true, given the amount of dedication and rationalism required to work that out! :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Sixty-two secondary school students participated in the study" non-pre-registered trial. Meh.
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.