I know. But I'm not curious enough to go to the original paper to see and get d's out of it. But I bet d>1.8 here.
-
-
Replying to @ArtirKel1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
d=0.67 for estimated frequency of crying???? Seems too low. I almost never see men crying!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArtirKel
I get d=.61. Not sure what you did. :P Maybe estimates are wrong, maybe men hide it more. Also, your friends are not random ppl.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @ArtirKel
Children, aged 10.6. d = .19. N=186 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3432210/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @ArtirKel
Here we go: meta-analysis, K=7, d=.84. https://books.google.dk/books?id=RHFYYwo9kREC&pg=PA60&lpg=PA60&dq=crying+frequency+by+gender&source=bl&ots=aoL7BjsADL&sig=SIT8pck8kc8hRoiW4HFOVaB6Blk&hl=da&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiEseHeoIDNAhXmFZoKHUgrDrYQ6AEIQTAG#v=onepage&q=crying%20frequency%20by%20gender&f=false … Guess our stereotypes were too strong! Or bad measurement.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
They did a meta and didn't publish the meta separately, why they do that to us!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArtirKel
Apparently, it only appears in that one book. E.g. as cited from http://bookzz.org/md5/A954338502851C82D6C8BAE3EC90496B … p. 289ff Even a cross-cultural study!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
Just for the lulz, what about your own experience in Denmark? How many men you know that have cried lately?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
None. :p Big study here, 37 countries. http://psych.cf.ac.uk/home2/manstead/2004_F,%20R-M,%20vV,%20M,%202004,%20Emotion,%204,%20p87.pdf … d = .81. Seems legit then. Total N not given. :/
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.