What if a sensitive person did numerical analyses of their own #crying habits? @personifiedself did http://www.robinwe.is/explorations/cry.html … Worth a read.
-
-
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
Feels like reading almost alien psychology to me :o
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArtirKel
Me too. Very uncommon combination of numerical skills, data focus and high emotional sensitivity.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
Exactly. But this shouldn't be that weird, neuroticism isn't particularly strongly correlated to g, or NFC or An. think.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArtirKel
I know another one like this, but too much ADHD to write the numbers down. But, fixed effect of gender too large.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @ArtirKel
I mean: what is the male/female d for crying? Definitely not below 0.5, more like 1 to 1.5, no?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=es&lr=&id=tS1C8Sl5ysEC&oi=fnd&pg=PA143&dq=crying+gender+difference+cohen&ots=gjslxBq397&sig=3BiNYcnbys2rpvzFm34-PQ20O4E&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=crying%20gender%20difference%20cohen&f=false … So 1.4(+-0.4) for males 5.3(+-0.4) for females, so even larger
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ArtirKel
These may be standard errors or confidence intervals, not SDs.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Also note that means and modes don't match: it's a power law distribution probably. Should use medians and MADs for that data.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.