What if a sensitive person did numerical analyses of their own #crying habits? @personifiedself did http://www.robinwe.is/explorations/cry.html … Worth a read.
-
https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=es&lr=&id=tS1C8Sl5ysEC&oi=fnd&pg=PA143&dq=crying+gender+difference+cohen&ots=gjslxBq397&sig=3BiNYcnbys2rpvzFm34-PQ20O4E&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=crying%20gender%20difference%20cohen&f=false … So 1.4(+-0.4) for males 5.3(+-0.4) for females, so even larger
-
-
Also note that means and modes don't match: it's a power law distribution probably. Should use medians and MADs for that data.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I know. But I'm not curious enough to go to the original paper to see and get d's out of it. But I bet d>1.8 here.
-
d=0.67 for estimated frequency of crying???? Seems too low. I almost never see men crying!
-
I get d=.61. Not sure what you did. :P Maybe estimates are wrong, maybe men hide it more. Also, your friends are not random ppl.
-
Children, aged 10.6. d = .19. N=186 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3432210/ …
-
For kids I accept it.
-
Here we go: meta-analysis, K=7, d=.84. https://books.google.dk/books?id=RHFYYwo9kREC&pg=PA60&lpg=PA60&dq=crying+frequency+by+gender&source=bl&ots=aoL7BjsADL&sig=SIT8pck8kc8hRoiW4HFOVaB6Blk&hl=da&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiEseHeoIDNAhXmFZoKHUgrDrYQ6AEIQTAG#v=onepage&q=crying%20frequency%20by%20gender&f=false … Guess our stereotypes were too strong! Or bad measurement.
-
Book not on libgen. :/
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.