The only issue I have with @@KirkegaardEmil study is that he did not anonymize the dataset. https://artir.wordpress.com/2016/05/13/in-defense-of-emil-kirkegaard/ …
-
Nope, you can use a standard scrapper to gather it, if you can Google your profile, it's public.
Some profiles are public, others are not (not sure what the system is). Google has a larger dataset of OKCupid than I have. ;)
-
-
Probably paid/free version difference. Thing is if the data is scrappable you are not erring on
#ethics -
.
@hashfyre Wrong. Tickbox in@OKCupid settings. Choosing 'public' for profile does not give access to question user answers@KirkegaardEmil -
As i said "If data is scrappable", if it's not then he is erring.
-
.
@hashfyre Answers to questions not able to be viewed (or scraped) unless logged in to@OKCupid, so clear violation of#TnC@KirkegaardEmil
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also remember 2014 http://www.wired.com/2014/01/how-to-hack-okcupid/ …
-
Actually, multiple people approached me saying they also scraped OKCupid, but they just didn't publish the dataset (AFAIK).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
.
@AlexTalksALot#OKC members agree to Stats/Qs being: used by@OKCupid match#algorithm; perused by prospective dates Not by@KirkegaardEmil
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.