The only issue I have with @@KirkegaardEmil study is that he did not anonymize the dataset. https://artir.wordpress.com/2016/05/13/in-defense-of-emil-kirkegaard/ …
The dataset is anonymized because it doesn't actually have people's real names. Just their already public pseudonyms.
-
-
then I have no clue what people are crying about, all pseudonyms are supposed to be public.
-
also only their public answers. One can answer privately but most don't.
-
We can agree that this is a non issue being bloated out of proportion.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.