The OKCupid paper has now been submitted. This means that the dataset is now public! Enjoy! :) http://openpsych.net/forum/showthread.php?tid=279 …
-
@KirkegaardEmil This data set is highly re-identifiable. Even includes usernames? Was any work at all done to anonymize it?
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
@KirkegaardEmil Differing degrees of “public”. Also different ethical guidelines. IMO, you should speak with a research ethicist/IRB ASAP.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
not however for the purposes provided to the site, unless you obtained 'express prior consent'.https://www.okcupid.com/legal/terms
-
"some may object to the ethics", so did you get ethical approval from elsewhere?
@TheABB
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You better get a lawyer to explain EU data protection law to you - chances are good that you're breaking it.
-
i tried to explain it to the editors. he is breaking Danish Data Protection Law http://openpsych.net/forum/showthread.php?tid=283&page=2 …
@KirkegaardEmil@esjewett -
He is the editor, is he not?
-
editor in chief. there are other editors, some of whom (if not all) have their own history http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/John_Fuerst …
@vhokstad
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm curious if you were logged into an OKCupid account when scrapping data?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
EU DPD article 1(e) "...in a form which permits identification of data subjects for no longer than is necessary "
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
since you have no consent from subjects, if anyone decides to sue, their odds will be pretty good.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.