@tjmahr @thosjleeper Definitely better than the base-r version. Lacks CV R2 and CIs. But handles interactions. :)
Is there a better alternative to the base-r summary()? Ideally one that works for all kinds of fit funcs (lm, glm, lmer, etc.) #rstats
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil What do you mean by "better"? -
@KirkegaardEmil Maybe play with broom or stargazer -
@thosjleeper broom is good, but still has problems such as with the names of levels. It is very flexible though.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil what are you looking for in#Rstts summary improvements? arm::display & umx::umxAPA worth a look -
@timothycbates Did not find anything better than what I had already written myself. Now I added reference levels.pic.twitter.com/nMJQBcv5f0
-
@timothycbates It should of course have the value 0 in the example. Mistakes were made. (Just in case someone was wondering.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.