Emil O W Kirkegaard

@GodDamnRoads I have no particular opinion aside from that they use different reference panels and that small %'s are unreliable.

@ArtirKel Well, I used to be Ashkenazi until DNA land downgraded me! :p

@KirkegaardEmil @ArtirKel demand an upgrade or at least allow you to pencil in your preferred id :P

@RCAFDM @ArtirKel 23andme still has me at more Neanderthal then Ashkenazi. Hope DNA land does not take my monkeyness away from me! :)

@KirkegaardEmil @ArtirKel haha someone should coin a word for that....

@KirkegaardEmil @ArtirKel looks like they no longer report precise estimates of Neanderthal ancestry

@KirkegaardEmil @ArtirKel (probably for good reason, but for lols....too bad)

@KirkegaardEmil @ArtirKel hmm really? maybe they have different front ends for non-US users or something (more likely given FDA issues)

@KirkegaardEmil What sort of SNP level agreement do you get?

@gwern Don't understand the question. :(

@ArtirKel @KirkegaardEmil maybe they customize the interface depending on your neanderthal factor :-)

@GodDamnRoads @KirkegaardEmil pretty much two different issues imo. how they setup their reference panels/analyze the data and precision

@GodDamnRoads @KirkegaardEmil e.g., my guess wrt IT estimate is the pop in central/southern Germany (some of my ancestors) & N. IT overlap

@GodDamnRoads @KirkegaardEmil i.e., it's somewhat arbitrary how they assign populations to particular places, how many they use, etc