![Groke [norn]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1181399541951545344/B5NRGYr-_normal.jpg)
@hpashler Yes, for another sensitive topic, but very small effect there. http://www.people.vcu.edu/~mamcdani/Publications/AOM_as_of_8%201%202008.pdf …
Reverse publication bias: when scientists want to find smaller effects. (IQ and GPA) http://www.sciencedirect.com.sci-hub.io/science/article/pii/S0160289615001269 …pic.twitter.com/77Yw3OdtyR
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil@hpashler That's a lot of heterogeneity! And are those imputed correlations > 1.0 I see? -
@KirkegaardEmil@hpashler (A good argument for transforming correlations to Fisher's Z for this kind of work!) -
@JoeHilgard@hpashler Yes, but they don't seem to mention the I2. I tried using FZ for one of my own meta-analysis but it made ~0 difference
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.