.@KirkegaardEmil http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289616300216 … states:no cov among factors once contr for g, hence g > mutualism. doesn't seem valid argument, no?
@EikoFried @MorHeene Like Shalizi's paper, it is attacking strawmen and disregarding relevant evidence, cf. http://humanvarieties.org/2013/04/03/is-psychometric-g-a-myth/ … Meh.
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil@EikoFried > a latent variable, simply a function, as a cause. Latent variables are not constituents of natural reality. -
@MorHeene@KirkegaardEmil We made the same point about depression here http://eiko-fried.com/wp-content/uploads/Fried_2016-04481-001.pdf …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil@EikoFried > a particular kind of function (e.g., a common factor variable) is creatable. Rank mythologizing to portrayThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil@EikoFried Notice, positive corr. among tests necessary but not sufficient for to g exist as a factor explaining corr.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil@EikoFried Modern g exists per definition (s. Perron-Frobenius and van Krijnen, 2002).Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil@EikoFried > Not an empirical observation but math. neccessityThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil@EikoFried Latent variable is a function. When the requirements of a particular latent variable model are satisfied,Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.