.@KirkegaardEmil http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289616300216 … states:no cov among factors once contr for g, hence g > mutualism. doesn't seem valid argument, no?
-
@rogierK@KirkegaardEmil@EikoFried You see, that's also my point: Sometimes g is the first common factor, sometimes a higher-order factor
@MorHeene @rogierK @EikoFried Makes little difference. Sometimes it's from bi-factor SEM. "Indifference of the method". ;)
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil@rogierK@EikoFried Indifference because this *method* always yields a first or higher-order factor. Hypothesis vs. method…Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil@rogierK@EikoFried First factor "g": Perron-Frobenius. Higher-order factor: Krijnen: Psychometrika 69 (2004): 655--660)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.