.@KirkegaardEmil http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289616300216 … states:no cov among factors once contr for g, hence g > mutualism. doesn't seem valid argument, no?
-
@KirkegaardEmil@EikoFried Spearman's g: Single common factor explains correlations among variables, no matter how large cor. matrix is
@MorHeene @EikoFried No scholar have defended the g-s model since the advent of multiple factor analysis to my knowledge.
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil@EikoFried BTW, my main points are summarized here: http://bit.ly/1RI1kzd -
@EikoFried@MorHeene Like Shalizi's paper, it is attacking strawmen and disregarding relevant evidence, cf. http://humanvarieties.org/2013/04/03/is-psychometric-g-a-myth/ … Meh. -
@KirkegaardEmil@EikoFried > a latent variable, simply a function, as a cause. Latent variables are not constituents of natural reality. -
@MorHeene@KirkegaardEmil We made the same point about depression here http://eiko-fried.com/wp-content/uploads/Fried_2016-04481-001.pdf …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil@EikoFried Sure, because it is more convenient to replace a falsified hypothesis by a method (FA) that will always work…Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.