.@KirkegaardEmil http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289616300216 … states:no cov among factors once contr for g, hence g > mutualism. doesn't seem valid argument, no?
-
@EikoFried He thinks mutualism → pos. covar after removal of g. Argument is probabilistic modus tollens.
@EikoFried But, no pos. covar in my simul after removal of g for data based on mutualistic model. At least for the networks I tried (random)
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil Yes that's what's to be expected. See@SachaEpskamp's Handbook of Psychometrics chapter showing models are math. equivalent. -
@EikoFried@SachaEpskamp Did not have time to read that yet, I'm busy with other projects. You know how it is. :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.