@AlxEtz do you know a good (or just the best) frequentist reply to the "intentions of the researcher"-argument sometimes made by Bayesians?
@AlxEtz i.e. with the intended analysis & interpretation planned so there can be no post-hoc researcher choice?
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil Yeah, that's the idea. Otherwise the criticism is unavoidableThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.