@KirkegaardEmil Paper is here https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3c4TxciNeJZUE9kQ2NMSnBmVGs/view … data is here https://osf.io/vkmep/files/ ht @timothycbates
Meta-analysis of SES x heritability interaction in children. Guess the outlier (easy, I put the name on it!).pic.twitter.com/EwuBmN2C52
-
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil@timothycbates and the effect was gone by 2007 -
Hi
@JamesPsychol, what's the 2007 idea?@KirkegaardEmil -
@timothycbates@KirkegaardEmil just that turkheimer 2007 had better sample and went the other way -
@JamesPsychol@KirkegaardEmil I think you mean Harden 2007, and it found GxSES in very hi IQ American kids (but no reverse-C effect) -
@timothycbates@KirkegaardEmil Harden, Turkheimer and Loehlin (2007) Behav Genet (2007) 37:273–283 DOI 10.1007/s10519-006-9113-4123
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil Note@ent3c 2003 reported 2 other effect sizes (.15 & .18), not as far right. To be fair, I report .19 at age2 in 2011 pub. -
@KirkegaardEmil@ent3c Meta-estimate is .074 for US. Agree that citing overestimates (and underestimates) is misleading.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.