worth adding that significant variables aren’t automatically good for understanding either http://jakewestfall.org/publications/ivy.pdf …https://twitter.com/russpoldrack/status/664496223395557376 …
-
@KirkegaardEmil@CookieSci no doubt. “we need this new measure because it captures error differently from all the other existing measures."
@talyarkoni @CookieSci That was one thing that bothered me about your paper. The subjective temperature ratings errors would correlate IRL.
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil@talyarkoni autocorr over time? (1) plausible but not a given (2) would adding this complication really help understanding?? -
@CookieSci@talyarkoni I meant just regular cor bwtn "subjectively perceived heat levels" & "estimate the average temperature for each day". -
@KirkegaardEmil@CookieSci sure; correlated error is a huge can of worms in its own right. but you can’t do everything in one paper :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@talyarkoni@CookieSci Just in the example given, the calculations took "shared error" into account ("delta").Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.