@KirkegaardEmil I don't believe it, and never did. Take a look at their confidence intervals.
H2 perhaps inflated for some traits, especially medical. H2 for height found to be .70, bit lower than usual .80.http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1003520 …
-
-
-
@JayMan471 your prior is too strong. In any case you can relax because they didn't correcorrect for measurement error. -
.
@KirkegaardEmil That too. I would hardly say my view on behavioral genetics (A high, D small, C 0, E small and noise ridden) is baseless. -
@JayMan471 no, but prior that C=0 is too strong. Pedigree studies have their problems. -
@KirkegaardEmil My post on the matter was all about that point. Education is the only exception.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.