-
-
Replying to @akarlin88
@akarlin88 Very good. :) But where are the bias results?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @akarlin88
@akarlin88 With so few questions, however, precision is not so high. I was expecting a low bias score for myself, however.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
@KirkegaardEmil There's a huge community of "rationalists" esp. in Bay Area obsessed with this: LessWrong, OvercomingBias, Yudkowsky, etc.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @akarlin88
@KirkegaardEmil Ironically a lot of them are less about real rationalism and more about passive aggressive SWPL/yuppie status signalling.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @akarlin88
@akarlin88@KirkegaardEmil I got 15/18 by noticing the questions were BS (they were not objective and just reflect establishment bias)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @narmno
@akarlin88@KirkegaardEmil I had to play this game http://lesswrong.com/lw/iq/guessing_the_teachers_password/ … to get a good score and it didn't feel good. I hate politics.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @narmno
@akarlin88@KirkegaardEmil This is not rationality, this tests narrow understanding (do you know what Cathedral is saying). Rubbish1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @narmno
@akarlin88@KirkegaardEmil One of the questions uses "consensus opinion of economists" as the "right answer" LOL!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@narmno @akarlin88 The real test of the use of a test is predictive validity. Content analysis will not do (Jensen 1980).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.