@KirkegaardEmil @JayMan471 This was surprising to me when I first read it, but reconfirmed in graph http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/actually-men-have-always-wanted-children-more-than-women/article23681771/ … [@dollarsandsex]
-
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil@JayMan471 Women = more cognizant of the costs of childbearing despite their enthusiasm for fields in which kids're involved -
@Billare@JayMan471 Women do want slightly more in cupid data.pic.twitter.com/2z96y5Mi7G
-
@KirkegaardEmil@JayMan471 Do you know the demographics of the first? I'm guessing OK Cupid has a higher SES base, w/more college grads -
@Billare@JayMan471 Of course, I have all their profile data (except for the text, which we forgot to scrape).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil Higher on the y axis is smarter yeah? These graphs have been cool, I just want to make sure Im reading them right. -
@TheRealChadtech Yes. I can send you the rest of them. -
@KirkegaardEmil Yeah sure. Thatd be interesting. - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil@JayMan471 Putting 'none' all the way on the left as '0' would make this plot more readable and the linear trend obvious. -
@gwern@JayMan471 The figure is one among 2500 others automatically generated by R. Changing the levels manually is a lot of work. -
@KirkegaardEmil Isn't it just `df$Kids <- ordered(df$Kids, levels=c("None","1-2","3-4","5 or more"))`? or df[df$Kids=="None",]$Kids <- 0?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
,
@KirkegaardEmil @dollarsandsex w + flexible prices for Wiho men who earn less may take care of kids + often -
@econoflove@KirkegaardEmil But do they really? I suspect men's contributions is tied to education and, therefore, income. -
'@dollarsandsex male and fem WiHo we observe differs from the optimal to the extent that inflexible rules guide division of time & $ in hh
-
@econoflove While is consist with the idea that higher income men contribute more. Mind you, there so much marital sorting now anyway. -
'@dollarsandsex but not enough matching of women's demand for men's WiHo w men's supply of that WiHo. rigidity in division of hh income...
-
@econoflove But do you really in think lower income men contribute more? In fact, I though female breadwinners contributed more? -
;@dollarsandsex if women in LF + than hsbd supply + chldcare that makes no sense. to bring + rational allocation of WiHo have them talk +..
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.