>ratings of female facial & vocal attractiveness were positively correlated (r = .592 N = 42 p = .001) http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/The-sound-of-female-shape-a-redundant-signal-of-vocal-and-facial-attractiveness..pdf … @JayMan471 PDF
-
@KirkegaardEmil Small samples are ripe for publication bias. Need large samples (>300) and should be ethnically homogenous.
@JayMan471 here's a prior one: r=.404, N=30, "30 female speakers, all British, aged 19–26 years (mean 21.4 years)." http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/Vocal-and-visual-attractiveness-are-related-in-women.pdf …
-
-
@JayMan471 this study has .29 for females (N=48) and .03 for men (N=62). http://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/wp-content/uploads/Effects-of-Attractiveness-and-Maturity-of-Face-and-Voice-on-Interpersonal-Impressions.pdf … but ... -
@JayMan471 it mentions two prior studies which fund .02 and .17 for F/M. so maybe its just publication bias, or maybe bad studies.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@KirkegaardEmil Still tiny sample, though.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.