For good researchers in legitimate fields, higher citation counts almost always indicates their best pieces. For sham activist fields (psych, education, social science), the more improbable and coerced the conclusion, the higher the cites, TED talks, book deals, etc...
Warne examines correlations between study qualities and citation rate among his own articles. (should have posted the table of data though! )https://twitter.com/Russwarne/status/1183425649748217856 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.