Scientific misconduct by ancestry/country (a review) https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=8063 pic.twitter.com/Ju25u7c9gp
-
Let the true rate be the triple of that reported in Ataie-Ashtiani's table, and I would still be positively surprised. I was expecting around twice the European rate.
Eh, I mean, it is above the USA rate in the other study. The problem is that Brazil produces so little science that it is hard to estimate how much of it is fraudulent...
-
-
The Fanelli 2019? Indeed, but notice that it's in line with the estimates for many European countries. That's why I was positively surprised, I imagined it would be worse.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.