Does this measure scientific misconduct, the ability to hide scientific misconduct, or (most likely) knowing what bad things, such as p-hacking, you can get away with.
Scientific misconduct by ancestry/country (a review) https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=8063 pic.twitter.com/Ju25u7c9gp
-
-
-
Crime studies generally don't find support for this "only stupid ones get caught" model.
-
But here we are looking at scientists doing non-impulsive things in a system where successful fraud can bring massive long-term personal gains.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What's wrong with the Dutch
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Positively surprised to see Brazil in the last positions of the cheating list.
-
Sampling error.
-
Let the true rate be the triple of that reported in Ataie-Ashtiani's table, and I would still be positively surprised. I was expecting around twice the European rate.
-
Eh, I mean, it is above the USA rate in the other study. The problem is that Brazil produces so little science that it is hard to estimate how much of it is fraudulent...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.