There's a new Shalizi/Taleb on the block. Wrote this long anti-IQ piece. It's kinda boring but looks impressive so I am sure will be popular. I assume someone is going to write a rebuttal for the relevant parts, most of it being irrelevant philosophy.https://medium.com/@seanaaron100/intelligence-complexity-and-the-failed-science-of-iq-4fb17ce3f12 …
-
-
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil
The g denial part is pathetic, all tests mesure the same g this isn't a PCA artifact
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @parabellummmm
Havne't you heard? They are all based on correlation! Correlation bad.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @KirkegaardEmil @parabellummmm
Correlation isn't bad, but there's a real risk of non linearities and/or mirage correlations
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @semiDL @parabellummmm
outcome ~ IQ are usually quite linear when checked. This is an old issue. Even when nonlinear, it's almost always monotonic. (Aside from sampling error) http://arthurjensen.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Occupation-and-Income-Related-to-Psychometric-g-2001-by-Helmuth-S%C3%B8rensen-Nyborg-Arthur-Robert-Jensen.pdf …pic.twitter.com/K3vQBrJhcA
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
11:04 AM - 22 Sep 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
6 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.