As I can see Plomin are not very good in NHST.pic.twitter.com/TJQ3H6F5Hn
-
-
-
Yep, he made some other blunders in his recent book. Plomin is ooold. To be fair, one can kinda ignore most of the NHST issues if one just has large samples to begin with. Except for the one where one concludes important because p=very small. But BG is always about effect sizes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Have you thought about finishing it on Infogalatic or Metapedia instead? Not saying you should give up the fight for wikipedia, but it would be better than nothing.
-
Metapedia too extreme for my tastes. Infogalatic too LARPy, Conservapedia too stupid.pic.twitter.com/CYJSJzZtm1
-
Infogalatic is definitely the best of the three, and the best wikipedia alternative I've seen. I like that it forks existing wiki articles for pages that aren't prone to bias. (eg a page on owls). But as its by a fantasy/sci fi author, I'm not surprised its a bit LARPy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What is "block him"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.