"The debate on PC lacks a prominent anti-PC side arguing for an open-ended critical discourse at the scientific and moral levels" @Outsideness @thespandrell @dpinsen @a_centrism @capitalismandf1https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11406-019-00094-4 …
In defense of scientific rationalism without the liberal presuppositions of Pinker et al. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11406-019-00094-4 …pic.twitter.com/qPqMGZ9MVs
-
-
-
"This leads us to a full circle where the debates about PC are themselves pc."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hard agree. Fish water etc. Pinker is very obviously religious, not scientific or philosophical.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.