Whoops. If you exclude studies written by a guy who pleaded guilty to faking data, incentives do *not* have a statistically significant effect on IQ test performance.https://twitter.com/pnin1957/status/1172537339673026560 …
Show this thread
-
Scarcity in Angry Birds improves motivation and performance. But scarcity of money decreases IQ ~12 points if primed in the subject. Authors explanation is something like “finances become more salient than test”. If ‘focus == motivation’, then your hypothesis is suppported
No, these money priming studies died in replication as well, along with every other social priming study I can think of.
-
-
This is not priming in the classical sense and is more like distraction, and as far as I’m aware a replication by OSF has not been attempted. Do you have a link to a failed replication?
-
OSF is a repository site, not an organization that does replications. Meta (
@JelteWicherts) https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-19962-005 … Replications http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2015/07/23/social-priming-money-for-nothing/ … More replicationshttps://twitter.com/BrianNosek/status/1143734971913445378 …
-
None of these are of the actual scarcity experiments as far as I can tell. Am I missing something?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.