The opposite of Hanlon's Razor is something like "never attribute to stupidity what can be adequately explained by not actually wanting to do the thing."
Show this thread
-
yes, saw that – apparently that reduces the effect size to .51 (and they chose to report the larger value as the headline result). but I continue not to believe it given that more direct tests found no effect
Given the obvious publication bias in the plot, obvious left wing interest in a positive, and the largest effects from a known faker. This one needs a big pre reg study and I will bet money it will come out near zero.
