Obvious to me from the first paragraph. Odd that it allegedly took these people 40 years. I'm skeptical of the assertion that Fisher wouldnt have been smarter.
-
-
-
No amount of intelligence can defeat a strong prior against the truth.
-
Didn't some people do some studies that suggested that in fact having higher intelligence just allowed for more elaborate reality denial? I think it was in pol sci.
@LJZigerell you recall? -
There are some links to related studies in this text https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2019/08/27/academe-should-avoid-politicizing-educational-attainment-opinion …pic.twitter.com/fdBd7BlcpJ
-
"Our hypothesis is that the function of reasoning is argumentative. It is to devise and evaluate arguments intended to persuade." https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00904097/document …
-
Why Smart People Are Vulnerable to Putting Tribe Before Truth:https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/why-smart-people-are-vulnerable-to-putting-tribe-before-truth/ …
-
Political commitments can scramble your brain and impair your ability to reason – especially if you're smart. Original Study (N = 1,111): https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/22105/833.pdf … Replication (N = 1,600): https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3026941 …
-
More Education Means More Polarization https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/10/opinion/democrats-partisanship-identity-politics.html …pic.twitter.com/eBGNUZ4oLs
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Krieger & Davey Smith used the birthweight paradox to show the limitations of Pearl's approach and to argue for the superiority of "triangulation" (they're right IMO):https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/45/6/1787/2617188 …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.