You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Lol. How do you think that conversation went? They ask and emil just belligerently blocks instead of explaining why he can't share the data? Let's ask: @KirkegaardEmil
These various people wrote to us under several pseudonyms on Twitter and email. Since I know their motivations, I had no interest in helping them out. The data are of course public since it's NLSY series, they are just too stupid/lazy to download it themselves.pic.twitter.com/gdvBXq8frq
In any case, John was somewhat nicer to them than I am to such ideologues.pic.twitter.com/Vdv1u7dnNN
Just a reminder, Emil, that I have requested for the sampled data & code to be made available publicly in the interests of #OpenScience. If you’re confident about your work, make these available so that it can be replicated. Motivations of others are irrelevant.
Do you believe it's reasonable for researchers to only submit their work to review by those whose motives they trust? If those who think you're a pseudoscientist were to replicate and confirm your work and results, that would make those results stronger, and you more credible.
Sure, they'll try to spot errors, but isn't that the point?
Thanks for responding Emil. From what I can see, the request made was for the data that you sampled from the NLSY series & the code that you used. Is it possible to make this available please?
We had the NLSY code, the original request was for your SYNTAX (lol!) and R files to see exactly how you did your analysis pipeline. You can't say you support open science selectively, it's all or none. What are you afraid of?
Uh, what.. ? Do you call data code and code syntax?
Ok, fine NLSY data! Do you not know what spss syntax files are?
No. I'm only vaguely familiar with spss. Enough to guess that's not what Emil and his coauthors were using (they probably used R or python)
This thread is about a different paper ("Global Ancestry and Cognitive Ability" not "Filling in the Gaps"). Regardless, still surprising to see spss in use!
Or at least the thread was originally about GACA and somewhere covertly switched to FITG. In any case, a motivated PI could easily sick a grad student on this
I'm Curious about your motivationshttps://mobile.twitter.com/KirkegaardEmil/status/1171535421819543552 …
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
