"We did not find evidence for anti-Black or anti-Hispanic disparity in police use of force across all shootings, and, if anything, found anti-White disparities when controlling for race-specific crime." Study based on>900 police shootings. https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2019/07/16/1903856116.full.pdf …
Sounds like it's time to use the Jussim arguments against people doing this sort of research. I mean, it surely fits the conditions you listed last time, no? @EPoe187
-
-
-
"This in particular" is a terrible argument. There are precisely 0 stats that tell anyone what causes what.
-
Wait, what? Causal reasoning is impossible now? Are we allowed to infer counterfactuals, even if you won’t allow us an experiment to validate? How much science do you aspire to prohibit? What underlies this drive?
-
I note that I did not write "Causal reasoning is impossible." I also have a low threshold for blocking. I do not mind clearing up bona fide misunderstandings, but I hate having to undo false straw versions of what I have stated.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think Lee would say we can study this with more certainty than causes of IQ disparities. I disagree, of course. But I think that would be his argument.
-
Exactly, Bo. Behavior is observable. Discrim is behavior by individuals against individuals. Behavior definitely can be studied scientifically.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I made the identical observation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.