Emil O W Kirkegaard

Valid criticisms as judged by your standards. Thus, him not accepting valid criticisms of Noah Carl as judged by your standards is an indication of his bias. Right? Also, I completely reject your equivocation with vaccines

See above. And again reread point 1. You keep thinking I am making an argument I have explicitly said I am not making. I don’t know how to make it more clearer that is not my argument.

We appear to be at impasse. I believe I correctly understood your point 1. I have been continually making claims about point 2. I incorrectly used “valid” in place of “legitimate”, but I do not think that changes my argument much.

Also, claims are not evidence. For example, there’s no evidence that vaccines cause autism even though there are “studies” that make that claim.

Exactly, Pamela. Along the same lines, let's briefly interrogate the claim that Carl committed some sort of Cardinal Sin by publishing in a clubby outlet like OpenPsych.

I plan to publish there because there aren’t many outlets that will publish articles on HBD. But I’m not a serious scholar so what would I know??

Why not Mankind Quarterly?

This study really bothered me, Lee and Ben. He says the sample is too small, but publishes it anyway and further subdivides his too small sample into white vs black fathers to study their comparative intelligence. I asked him the purpose of the study. He blocked me. Link in next