According to brainlets, mentioning someone's characteristic head shape in a biography is muh phrenology. https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Quillette&diff=2097443&oldid=2091070 …pic.twitter.com/TpdpvkXbOd
-
The counter is "Phrenology is real, nerd" and then Gish-galloping them with studies about intracranial volume. They're losers arguing in bad faith, so you can have fun with it.
I approve of the troll reply, but technically speaking, volume etc. falls under craniometry. Phrenology was about bumps and stuff. There is actually a proper test of phrenology, and it didn't work, so in this case, the criticism is correct.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945218301436 …
-
-
Next level trolling - roll the combination of craniometry and physiognomy into a new area of study called phrenology (nothing to do with the old area of study called phrenology)
-
I have 100k profiles and photos. So if I only had the time...
-
Annotated photos?!
-
Photos from profiles with lots of data.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.